Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Capital flows not elsewhere included

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
-2.01 billion BoP, current US$
in 1999
Zimbabwe
711.18 million BoP, current US$
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
3rd
Zimbabwe rank
3rd

Capital flows not elsewhere included over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Zimbabwe
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B198019952011

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 711.18 million BoP, current US$ against -2.01 billion BoP, current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 2.72 billion BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 6 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 603.37 million BoP, current US$ -20.32 million BoP, current US$ 623.69 million BoP, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1990s -1.62 billion BoP, current US$ -91.81 million BoP, current US$ 1.52 billion BoP, current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capital flows not elsewhere included, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 711.18 million BoP, current US$ against -2.01 billion BoP, current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2011.
What is the difference in capital flows not elsewhere included between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
2.72 billion BoP, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1999.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for capital flows not elsewhere included?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank country economists, published as Capital flows not elsewhere included (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Capital flows not elsewhere included. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank country economists. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/capital-flows-not-elsewhere-included-bop-current-us/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/capital-flows-not-elsewhere-included-bop-current-us/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Capital flows not elsewhere included</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capital flows not elsewhere included (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
World Bank country economists
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 1,468 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

This item comprises capital transactions not included elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.