Barbados vs Hong Kong: Export unit values, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Export unit values, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products) over time
- Barbados
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.9984 against 0.9468 in Barbados, a difference of 0.0516.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 22nd and Hong Kong ranks 19th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.05 | 0.8533 | 0.1971 | Barbados |
| 1970s | 0.8927 | 0.9176 | 0.0249 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 0.8328 | 0.7415 | 0.0912 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 1.08 | 0.8149 | 0.2689 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0.9972 | 0.8166 | 0.1806 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.7635 | 0.9173 | 0.1539 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit values, us dollar, Barbados or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 0.9984 against 0.9468 in Barbados as of 2014.
- What is the difference in export unit values, us dollar between Barbados and Hong Kong?
- 0.0516, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Hong Kong?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Barbados and Hong Kong rank globally for export unit values, us dollar?
- Barbados ranks 22nd and Hong Kong ranks 19th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Export unit values, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.