Chile vs Hong Kong: Export unit values, US dollar
Export unit values, US dollar over time
- Chile
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.9994 against 0.9984 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Chile ranks 18th and Hong Kong ranks 19th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9038 | 0.8533 | 0.0505 | Chile |
| 1970s | 0.9407 | 0.9176 | 0.0231 | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.8075 | 0.7415 | 0.066 | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.809 | 0.8149 | 0.0059 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.8451 | 0.8166 | 0.0285 | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.9603 | 0.9173 | 0.0429 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit values, us dollar, Chile or Hong Kong?
- Chile, at 0.9994 against 0.9984 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in export unit values, us dollar between Chile and Hong Kong?
- 0.001, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hong Kong?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Chile and Hong Kong rank globally for export unit values, us dollar?
- Chile ranks 18th and Hong Kong ranks 19th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Export unit values, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.