Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Export unit values, US dollar
Export unit values, US dollar over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.6444 against 0.6418 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0026.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9598 | 0.9676 | 0.0078 | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 0.9286 | 0.9311 | 0.0025 | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 0.7108 | 0.886 | 0.1752 | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 0.5771 | 0.7392 | 0.1621 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0.5536 | 0.6689 | 0.1153 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.7625 | 0.7557 | 0.0068 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit values, us dollar, Equatorial Guinea or Nicaragua?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.6444 against 0.6418 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
- What is the difference in export unit values, us dollar between Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 0.0026, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua rank globally for export unit values, us dollar?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 117th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Export unit values, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.