Korea vs Latvia: Export unit values, US dollar
Export unit values, US dollar over time
- Korea
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.735 against 0.7318 in Korea, a difference of 0.0032.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Korea ahead.
Korea ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 74th of 166 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8366 | 0.41 | 0.4266 | Korea |
| 2000s | 0.7067 | 0.5022 | 0.2044 | Korea |
| 2010s | 0.7507 | 0.6608 | 0.0899 | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit values, us dollar, Korea or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.735 against 0.7318 in Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in export unit values, us dollar between Korea and Latvia?
- 0.0032, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2014.
- How do Korea and Latvia rank globally for export unit values, us dollar?
- Korea ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 74th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Export unit values, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.