Afghanistan vs Tajikistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Afghanistan
2.04 billion
in 2023
Tajikistan
2.85 billion
in 2030
Afghanistan rank
31st
Tajikistan rank
30th

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Tajikistan
01.0B2.0B3.0B200020152030

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 2.85 billion against 2.04 billion in Afghanistan, a difference of 808.42 million.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.4 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 31st and Tajikistan ranks 30th of 31 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 1.42 billion 708.50 million 709.97 million Afghanistan
2010s 1.82 billion 1.02 billion 798.68 million Afghanistan
2020s 1.75 billion 1.86 billion 108.88 million Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Afghanistan or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 2.85 billion against 2.04 billion in Afghanistan as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Afghanistan and Tajikistan?
808.42 million, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Tajikistan?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Tajikistan rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Afghanistan ranks 31st and Tajikistan ranks 30th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Tajikistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/afghanistan/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/afghanistan/tajikistan/">Afghanistan vs Tajikistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.