Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Azerbaijan
25.67 billion
in 2030
Jordan
31.79 billion
in 2030
Azerbaijan rank
16th
Jordan rank
15th

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Jordan
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200020152030

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 31.79 billion against 25.67 billion in Azerbaijan, a difference of 6.13 billion.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 16th and Jordan ranks 15th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 11.42 billion 7.07 billion 4.35 billion Azerbaijan
2010s 27.77 billion 14.40 billion 13.37 billion Azerbaijan
2020s 28.99 billion 22.55 billion 6.44 billion Azerbaijan
2030s 25.67 billion 31.79 billion 6.13 billion Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Azerbaijan or Jordan?
Jordan, at 31.79 billion against 25.67 billion in Azerbaijan as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Azerbaijan and Jordan?
6.13 billion, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Jordan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Azerbaijan and Jordan rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Azerbaijan ranks 16th and Jordan ranks 15th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/azerbaijan/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/azerbaijan/jordan/">Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.