Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Egypt
102.27 billion
in 2030
Kazakhstan
112.63 billion
in 2030
Egypt rank
8th
Kazakhstan rank
6th

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Egypt
  • Kazakhstan
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B125.0B200020152030

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 112.63 billion against 102.27 billion in Egypt, a difference of 10.37 billion.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 6th of 31 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 29.12 billion 32.27 billion 3.15 billion Kazakhstan
2010s 44.94 billion 70.38 billion 25.44 billion Kazakhstan
2020s 70.28 billion 89.57 billion 19.29 billion Kazakhstan
2030s 102.27 billion 112.63 billion 10.37 billion Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Egypt or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 112.63 billion against 102.27 billion in Egypt as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Egypt and Kazakhstan?
10.37 billion, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Egypt and Kazakhstan rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Egypt ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/egypt-arab-rep/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/egypt-arab-rep/kazakhstan/">Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.