Iraq vs Saudi Arabia: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Iraq
125.50 billion
in 2030
Saudi Arabia
436.46 billion
in 2030
Iraq rank
5th
Saudi Arabia rank
2nd

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Iraq
  • Saudi Arabia
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B200020152030

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 436.46 billion against 125.50 billion in Iraq, a difference of 310.95 billion.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 3.5 times Iraq's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 5th and Saudi Arabia ranks 2nd of 31 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 35.41 billion 220.58 billion 185.18 billion Saudi Arabia
2010s 76.37 billion 303.97 billion 227.60 billion Saudi Arabia
2020s 101.90 billion 358.33 billion 256.44 billion Saudi Arabia
2030s 125.50 billion 436.46 billion 310.95 billion Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Iraq or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 436.46 billion against 125.50 billion in Iraq as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Iraq and Saudi Arabia?
310.95 billion, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Saudi Arabia?
27 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2030.
How do Iraq and Saudi Arabia rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Iraq ranks 5th and Saudi Arabia ranks 2nd of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Saudi Arabia: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/iraq/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/iraq/saudi-arabia/">Iraq vs Saudi Arabia: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.