West Bank and Gaza vs Sudan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

West Bank and Gaza
2.89 billion
in 2024
Sudan
7.61 billion
in 2030
West Bank and Gaza rank
29th
Sudan rank
26th

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • West Bank and Gaza
  • Sudan
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B12.5B200020152030

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 7.61 billion against 2.89 billion in West Bank and Gaza, a difference of 4.72 billion.

That makes Sudan's figure about 2.6 times West Bank and Gaza's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sudan ahead.

West Bank and Gaza ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 26th of 31 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade West Bank and Gaza Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 791.48 million 5.30 billion 4.51 billion Sudan
2010s 2.16 billion 6.54 billion 4.38 billion Sudan
2020s 3.02 billion 4.79 billion 1.76 billion Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), West Bank and Gaza or Sudan?
Sudan, at 7.61 billion against 2.89 billion in West Bank and Gaza as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between West Bank and Gaza and Sudan?
4.72 billion, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for West Bank and Gaza and Sudan?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do West Bank and Gaza and Sudan rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
West Bank and Gaza ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 26th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

West Bank and Gaza vs Sudan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/item-9/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/item-9/sudan/">West Bank and Gaza vs Sudan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.