Jordan vs Uzbekistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Jordan
31.79 billion
in 2030
Uzbekistan
48.90 billion
in 2030
Jordan rank
15th
Uzbekistan rank
14th

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Jordan
  • Uzbekistan
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200020152030

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 48.90 billion against 31.79 billion in Jordan, a difference of 17.11 billion.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.5 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 7.07 billion 6.42 billion 654.79 million Jordan
2010s 14.40 billion 13.18 billion 1.22 billion Jordan
2020s 22.55 billion 29.50 billion 6.95 billion Uzbekistan
2030s 31.79 billion 48.90 billion 17.11 billion Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Jordan or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 48.90 billion against 31.79 billion in Jordan as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Jordan and Uzbekistan?
17.11 billion, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Jordan and Uzbekistan rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Jordan ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Uzbekistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/jordan/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/jordan/uzbekistan/">Jordan vs Uzbekistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.