Pakistan vs Uzbekistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Pakistan
55.43 billion
in 2030
Uzbekistan
48.90 billion
in 2030
Pakistan rank
12th
Uzbekistan rank
14th

Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Uzbekistan
020.0B40.0B60.0B200020152030

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 55.43 billion against 48.90 billion in Uzbekistan, a difference of 6.52 billion.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 31 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 16.64 billion 6.42 billion 10.23 billion Pakistan
2010s 29.38 billion 13.18 billion 16.21 billion Pakistan
2020s 40.20 billion 29.50 billion 10.70 billion Pakistan
2030s 55.43 billion 48.90 billion 6.52 billion Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Pakistan or Uzbekistan?
Pakistan, at 55.43 billion against 48.90 billion in Uzbekistan as of 2030.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Pakistan and Uzbekistan?
6.52 billion, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Pakistan and Uzbekistan rank globally for exports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Pakistan ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Uzbekistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/pakistan/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/pakistan/uzbekistan/">Pakistan vs Uzbekistan: Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.