Barbados vs Botswana: Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 13.70 million against 9.20 million in Barbados, a difference of 4.50 million.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 122nd and Botswana ranks 119th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.86 million | 5.06 million | 805,625 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 4.08 million | 13.16 million | 9.08 million | Botswana |
| 2020s | 7.71 million | 14.49 million | 6.78 million | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Barbados or Botswana?
- Botswana, at 13.70 million against 9.20 million in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Barbados and Botswana?
- 4.50 million, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 122nd and Botswana ranks 119th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.