Cambodia vs Costa Rica: Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Cambodia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 134.81 million against 116.58 million in Costa Rica, a difference of 18.23 million.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Cambodia ranks 75th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.80 million | 102.93 million | 101.13 million | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 11.37 million | 86.14 million | 74.77 million | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 169.43 million | 108.15 million | 61.27 million | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Cambodia or Costa Rica?
- Cambodia, at 134.81 million against 116.58 million in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Cambodia and Costa Rica?
- 18.23 million, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Costa Rica?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Costa Rica rank globally for exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Cambodia ranks 75th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.