Eswatini vs New Caledonia: Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Eswatini
1.63 million
in 2023
New Caledonia
1.60 million
in 2015
Eswatini rank
153rd
New Caledonia rank
154th
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Eswatini
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1.63 million against 1.60 million in New Caledonia, a difference of 23,780.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 153rd and New Caledonia ranks 154th of 187 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.61 million | 11.93 million | 10.31 million | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 2.26 million | 3.66 million | 1.40 million | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Eswatini or New Caledonia?
- Eswatini, at 1.63 million against 1.60 million in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Eswatini and New Caledonia?
- 23,780, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and New Caledonia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Eswatini and New Caledonia rank globally for exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 153rd and New Caledonia ranks 154th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.