Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Rwanda
6.91 million
in 2022
Zimbabwe
7.83 million
in 2024
Rwanda rank
130th
Zimbabwe rank
127th
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 7.83 million against 6.91 million in Rwanda, a difference of 922,350.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Rwanda ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 187 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 466,706 | 10.32 million | 9.85 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.33 million | 6.99 million | 4.65 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 6.92 million | 7.79 million | 867,680 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 7.83 million against 6.91 million in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 922,350, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Rwanda ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.