Serbia vs South Africa: Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Serbia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 1.75 billion against 1.55 billion in Serbia, a difference of 193.02 million.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was South Africa ahead.
Serbia ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 44th of 187 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 306.22 million | 3.30 billion | 3.00 billion | South Africa |
| 2010s | 550.10 million | 2.82 billion | 2.27 billion | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1.27 billion | 2.10 billion | 827.11 million | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Serbia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 1.75 billion against 1.55 billion in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Serbia and South Africa?
- 193.02 million, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and South Africa?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and South Africa rank globally for exports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Serbia ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 44th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.