Eswatini vs Kenya: Import product concentration index
Import product concentration index over time
- Eswatini
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0.1449 against 0.1382 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0067.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kenya ahead.
Eswatini ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 25th of 53 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.051 | 0.0872 | 0.0361 | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.0931 | 0.127 | 0.0338 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.1119 | 0.1419 | 0.03 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import product concentration index, Eswatini or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 0.1449 against 0.1382 in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in import product concentration index between Eswatini and Kenya?
- 0.0067, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kenya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Kenya rank globally for import product concentration index?
- Eswatini ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 25th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNCTAD Statistical Office, also reported in the UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics, various issues (http://unctadstat.unctad.org/), published as Import product concentration index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator reflects the Herfindahl-Hirschmann index measure of the degree of import concentration within a country. The sectoral Hirschmann index is defined as the square root of the sum of the squared shares of exports of each industry in total exports for the region under study. Takes a value between 0 and 1, with 1 indicating that only a single product is exported. Higher values indicate that imports are concentrated in fewer sectors. On the contrary, values closer to 0 reflect a more equal distribution of market shares among importers. Note that this type of concentration indicator tends to be quite vulnerable to cyclical fluctuations in relative-prices, in a way that commodity price rises make commodity importers look more concentrated.