Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.6762 against 0.6613 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0149.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 165th and Rwanda ranks 163rd of 166 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.9005 | 0.8194 | 0.0812 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1980s | 0.9833 | 0.886 | 0.0973 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1990s | 0.9072 | 0.8195 | 0.0877 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 0.9033 | 0.7874 | 0.1159 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 0.7724 | 0.7122 | 0.0602 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Antigua and Barbuda or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.6762 against 0.6613 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
- 0.0149, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 165th and Rwanda ranks 163rd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.