Argentina vs Equatorial Guinea: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Argentina
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.7508 against 0.7389 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0119.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Argentina ranks 157th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 154th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9002 | 1 | 0.1044 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.8781 | 0.9805 | 0.1024 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 0.8583 | 0.9785 | 0.1203 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 0.8454 | 0.7821 | 0.0633 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.7982 | 0.5784 | 0.2198 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.7765 | 0.4904 | 0.2861 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Argentina or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.7508 against 0.7389 in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Argentina and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0119, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Equatorial Guinea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Argentina ranks 157th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 154th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.