Chile vs Ecuador: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Chile
- Ecuador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.9079 against 0.9028 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0051.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Ecuador ahead.
Chile ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 86th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.965 | 1 | 0.0356 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.9526 | 0.9458 | 0.0068 | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.9312 | 0.9462 | 0.015 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 0.9321 | 0.9371 | 0.005 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.9216 | 0.9282 | 0.0066 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.921 | 0.9127 | 0.0082 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Chile or Ecuador?
- Chile, at 0.9079 against 0.9028 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Chile and Ecuador?
- 0.0051, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Chile ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 86th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.