Congo vs Nepal: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Congo
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.7976 against 0.7942 in Congo, a difference of 0.0034.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 142nd and Nepal ranks 140th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9563 | 0.7888 | 0.1675 | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.9307 | 0.7162 | 0.2145 | Congo |
| 1980s | 0.843 | 0.8 | 0.0429 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.7635 | 0.7875 | 0.0241 | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0.6967 | 0.7374 | 0.0408 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.6243 | 0.7985 | 0.1742 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Congo or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0.7976 against 0.7942 in Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Congo and Nepal?
- 0.0034, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Congo ranks 142nd and Nepal ranks 140th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.