Eswatini vs Namibia: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Eswatini
- Namibia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.8902 against 0.8856 in Namibia, a difference of 0.0046.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 98th of 166 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8032 | 0.9184 | 0.1153 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.8342 | 0.8921 | 0.0579 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Eswatini or Namibia?
- Eswatini, at 0.8902 against 0.8856 in Namibia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Eswatini and Namibia?
- 0.0046, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Eswatini ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 98th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.