Eswatini vs Seychelles: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Eswatini
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 0.8912 against 0.8902 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.001.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 95th and Seychelles ranks 94th of 166 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8032 | 0.8992 | 0.096 | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 0.8342 | 0.8894 | 0.0552 | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Eswatini or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 0.8912 against 0.8902 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Eswatini and Seychelles?
- 0.001, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Seychelles?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Seychelles rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Eswatini ranks 95th and Seychelles ranks 94th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.