Guatemala vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Guatemala
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.8819 against 0.878 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0039.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 102nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 166 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.9275 | 0.6822 | 0.2452 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.8767 | 0.5561 | 0.3206 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.8537 | 0.7084 | 0.1453 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.8668 | 0.9519 | 0.0851 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Guatemala or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Guatemala, at 0.8819 against 0.878 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Guatemala and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0039, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Guatemala ranks 102nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.