Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Hong Kong, China or Malta?

Malta, at 0.9034 against 0.8982 in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?

52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Import quality, Mean, US dollar

Hong Kong, China

0.8982

in 2014

Malta

0.9034

in 2014

Hong Kong, China rank

87th

Malta rank

84th

Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time

Hong Kong, China
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.9034 against 0.8982 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0052.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Malta ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 87th and Malta ranks 84th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong, China	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.8373	0.911	0.0737	Malta
1970s	0.8389	0.9675	0.1286	Malta
1980s	0.9189	0.9847	0.0658	Malta
1990s	0.9092	0.9571	0.0479	Malta
2000s	0.8969	0.8807	0.0161	Hong Kong, China
2010s	0.876	0.9064	0.0304	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Hong Kong, China or Malta?: Malta, at 0.9034 against 0.8982 in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Hong Kong, China and Malta?: 0.0052, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?: 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?: Hong Kong, China ranks 87th and Malta ranks 84th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Import quality, Mean, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/import-quality-mean-us-dollar-acm1-agricultural-products/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/import-quality-mean-us-dollar-acm1-agricultural-products/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Import quality, Mean, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 166 places, 7,433 data points, 1963–2014
Last refreshed: 19 August 2026

This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.