Indonesia vs Nepal: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Indonesia
- Nepal
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.8164 against 0.7976 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0188.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 137th and Nepal ranks 140th of 166 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8263 | 0.7888 | 0.0375 | Indonesia |
| 1970s | 0.8727 | 0.7162 | 0.1564 | Indonesia |
| 1980s | 0.8587 | 0.8 | 0.0587 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.8409 | 0.7875 | 0.0534 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.8275 | 0.7374 | 0.0901 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.8431 | 0.7985 | 0.0446 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Indonesia or Nepal?
- Indonesia, at 0.8164 against 0.7976 in Nepal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Indonesia and Nepal?
- 0.0188, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Indonesia ranks 137th and Nepal ranks 140th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.