Italy vs Latvia: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.9999 against 0.9961 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0038.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 18th and Latvia ranks 20th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.01 | 0.937 | 0.0758 | Italy |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.9775 | 0.0268 | Italy |
| 2010s | 0.9983 | 0.9997 | 0.0014 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Italy or Latvia?
- Italy, at 0.9999 against 0.9961 in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Italy and Latvia?
- 0.0038, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2014.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Italy ranks 18th and Latvia ranks 20th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.