South Korea vs Tunisia: Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products) over time
- South Korea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.9525 against 0.9478 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0047.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Tunisia ahead.
South Korea ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 166 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8218 | 0.9317 | 0.11 | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.8306 | 0.9626 | 0.132 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 0.8121 | 0.9646 | 0.1524 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.8734 | 0.9912 | 0.1178 | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.9105 | 0.9643 | 0.0537 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.9451 | 0.9547 | 0.0096 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, South Korea or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.9525 against 0.9478 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between South Korea and Tunisia?
- 0.0047, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Tunisia?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Tunisia rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- South Korea ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.