Malawi vs Uzbekistan: Import quality, Mean, US dollar
Import quality, Mean, US dollar over time
- Malawi
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.9245 against 0.9208 in Malawi, a difference of 0.0037.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Malawi ranks 74th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9621 | 0.948 | 0.014 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.9322 | 0.9463 | 0.0141 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.9349 | 0.9467 | 0.0118 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import quality, mean, us dollar, Malawi or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.9245 against 0.9208 in Malawi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import quality, mean, us dollar between Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0037, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2014.
- How do Malawi and Uzbekistan rank globally for import quality, mean, us dollar?
- Malawi ranks 74th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import quality, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.