Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guatemala: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Guatemala
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.8221 against 0.8193 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0028.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guatemala ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 122nd and Guatemala ranks 124th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7334 | 0.7944 | 0.061 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.847 | 0.7586 | 0.0884 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 0.7598 | 0.826 | 0.0662 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guatemala?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.8221 against 0.8193 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
- 0.0028, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 122nd and Guatemala ranks 124th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.