Burundi vs El Salvador: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar over time
- Burundi
- El Salvador
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.7898 against 0.7882 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0016.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was El Salvador ahead.
Burundi ranks 135th and El Salvador ranks 136th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9755 | 1.05 | 0.0738 | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.0096 | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 1.03 | 1.01 | 0.0248 | Burundi |
| 1990s | 0.8594 | 0.868 | 0.0086 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 0.7138 | 0.7802 | 0.0664 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.7635 | 0.7962 | 0.0327 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Burundi or El Salvador?
- Burundi, at 0.7898 against 0.7882 in El Salvador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Burundi and El Salvador?
- 0.0016, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and El Salvador?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Burundi and El Salvador rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Burundi ranks 135th and El Salvador ranks 136th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.