Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Latvia: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Latvia
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 0.8621 against 0.8605 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0016.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 105th of 166 countries.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8295 | 0.8145 | 0.015 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
| 2000s | 0.9606 | 0.7929 | 0.1678 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
| 2010s | 0.8908 | 0.7939 | 0.0969 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Latvia?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 0.8621 against 0.8605 in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Latvia?
- 0.0016, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2014.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Latvia rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 105th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.