Ecuador vs Israel: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar over time
- Ecuador
- Israel
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.9821 against 0.979 in Israel, a difference of 0.0031.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Israel ranks 30th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9034 | 0.8682 | 0.0352 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.8715 | 0.9378 | 0.0662 | Israel |
| 1980s | 0.8407 | 0.8869 | 0.0462 | Israel |
| 1990s | 0.7959 | 0.9424 | 0.1465 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.8664 | 0.9757 | 0.1093 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.9643 | 0.983 | 0.0187 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Ecuador or Israel?
- Ecuador, at 0.9821 against 0.979 in Israel as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Ecuador and Israel?
- 0.0031, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Israel?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Israel rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Israel ranks 30th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.