Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 0.8038 against 0.7976 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0062.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Tanzania ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Tanzania ranks 129th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.03 | 0.9184 | 0.109 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 1.01 | 0.973 | 0.0378 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 0.9112 | 0.9565 | 0.0453 | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 0.7818 | 0.8255 | 0.0437 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0.8914 | 0.8172 | 0.0742 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 1.04 | 0.8306 | 0.211 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Equatorial Guinea or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 0.8038 against 0.7976 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania?
- 0.0062, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Tanzania ranks 129th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.