Hong Kong vs Japan: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products) over time
- Hong Kong
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1.03 against 1.02 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 13th and Japan ranks 10th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.903 | 0.9263 | 0.0232 | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.928 | 0.8669 | 0.0611 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 0.8092 | 0.8461 | 0.0369 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.8187 | 0.8657 | 0.0469 | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.8341 | 0.9159 | 0.0817 | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.8986 | 0.9799 | 0.0813 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Hong Kong or Japan?
- Japan, at 1.03 against 1.02 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Hong Kong and Japan?
- 0.01, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Japan?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Japan rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Hong Kong ranks 13th and Japan ranks 10th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.