Latvia vs Nepal: Import unit values, Mean, US dollar
Import unit values, Mean, US dollar over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8605 against 0.8571 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0034.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 107th of 166 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8145 | 0.6361 | 0.1784 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.7929 | 0.7115 | 0.0813 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.7939 | 0.6667 | 0.1272 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit values, mean, us dollar, Latvia or Nepal?
- Latvia, at 0.8605 against 0.8571 in Nepal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in import unit values, mean, us dollar between Latvia and Nepal?
- 0.0034, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2014.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for import unit values, mean, us dollar?
- Latvia ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 107th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Import unit values, Mean, US dollar (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.