Algeria vs Uzbekistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Algeria
68.21 billion
in 2030
Uzbekistan
75.90 billion
in 2030
Algeria rank
12th
Uzbekistan rank
11th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Algeria
  • Uzbekistan
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B200020152030

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 75.90 billion against 68.21 billion in Algeria, a difference of 7.68 billion.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 11th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 25.80 billion 5.84 billion 19.96 billion Algeria
2010s 60.64 billion 17.44 billion 43.20 billion Algeria
2020s 54.34 billion 47.53 billion 6.81 billion Algeria
2030s 68.21 billion 75.90 billion 7.68 billion Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Algeria or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 75.90 billion against 68.21 billion in Algeria as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Algeria and Uzbekistan?
7.68 billion, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Algeria and Uzbekistan rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Algeria ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 11th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Uzbekistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/algeria/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/algeria/uzbekistan/">Algeria vs Uzbekistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.