Azerbaijan vs Lebanon: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Azerbaijan
26.22 billion
in 2030
Lebanon
22.55 billion
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
17th
Lebanon rank
19th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Lebanon
010.0B20.0B30.0B200020152030

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 26.22 billion against 22.55 billion in Lebanon, a difference of 3.67 billion.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times Lebanon's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lebanon ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 17th and Lebanon ranks 19th of 31 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s 6.43 billion 17.98 billion 11.55 billion Lebanon
2010s 17.07 billion 32.05 billion 14.98 billion Lebanon
2020s 21.10 billion 20.80 billion 297.96 million Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Azerbaijan or Lebanon?
Azerbaijan, at 26.22 billion against 22.55 billion in Lebanon as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Azerbaijan and Lebanon?
3.67 billion, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Lebanon?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Lebanon rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Azerbaijan ranks 17th and Lebanon ranks 19th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Lebanon: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/azerbaijan/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/azerbaijan/lebanon/">Azerbaijan vs Lebanon: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.