Bahrain vs Uzbekistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Bahrain
41.53 billion
in 2030
Uzbekistan
75.90 billion
in 2030
Bahrain rank
14th
Uzbekistan rank
11th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Bahrain
  • Uzbekistan
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B200020152030

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 75.90 billion against 41.53 billion in Bahrain, a difference of 34.37 billion.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.8 times Bahrain's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 11th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 10.96 billion 5.84 billion 5.13 billion Bahrain
2010s 24.12 billion 17.44 billion 6.68 billion Bahrain
2020s 34.21 billion 47.53 billion 13.33 billion Uzbekistan
2030s 41.53 billion 75.90 billion 34.37 billion Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Bahrain or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 75.90 billion against 41.53 billion in Bahrain as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Bahrain and Uzbekistan?
34.37 billion, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Bahrain and Uzbekistan rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Bahrain ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 11th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahrain vs Uzbekistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/bahrain/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/bahrain/uzbekistan/">Bahrain vs Uzbekistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.