Iraq vs Kazakhstan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Iraq
121.16 billion
in 2030
Kazakhstan
90.98 billion
in 2030
Iraq rank
6th
Kazakhstan rank
9th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Iraq
  • Kazakhstan
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B125.0B200020152030

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 121.16 billion against 90.98 billion in Kazakhstan, a difference of 30.18 billion.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Iraq ranks 6th and Kazakhstan ranks 9th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 33.16 billion 35.14 billion 1.97 billion Kazakhstan
2010s 64.81 billion 49.84 billion 14.97 billion Iraq
2020s 95.09 billion 71.51 billion 23.58 billion Iraq
2030s 121.16 billion 90.98 billion 30.18 billion Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Iraq or Kazakhstan?
Iraq, at 121.16 billion against 90.98 billion in Kazakhstan as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Iraq and Kazakhstan?
30.18 billion, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kazakhstan?
27 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2030.
How do Iraq and Kazakhstan rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Iraq ranks 6th and Kazakhstan ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Kazakhstan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/iraq/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/iraq/kazakhstan/">Iraq vs Kazakhstan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.