Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Kazakhstan
90.98 billion
in 2030
Pakistan
94.47 billion
in 2030
Kazakhstan rank
9th
Pakistan rank
8th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Pakistan
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B100.0B200020152030

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 94.47 billion against 90.98 billion in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.49 billion.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pakistan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 9th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 25.53 billion 24.61 billion 919.91 million Kazakhstan
2010s 49.84 billion 51.81 billion 1.98 billion Pakistan
2020s 71.51 billion 71.87 billion 361.43 million Pakistan
2030s 90.98 billion 94.47 billion 3.49 billion Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Kazakhstan or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 94.47 billion against 90.98 billion in Kazakhstan as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
3.49 billion, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Kazakhstan and Pakistan rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Kazakhstan ranks 9th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/kazakhstan/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/kazakhstan/pakistan/">Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.