Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Kyrgyzstan
20.98 billion
in 2030
Tunisia
25.90 billion
in 2030
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Tunisia rank
18th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Tunisia
010.0B20.0B30.0B200020152030

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 25.90 billion against 20.98 billion in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.93 billion.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th and Tunisia ranks 18th of 31 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.92 billion 15.63 billion 13.71 billion Tunisia
2010s 5.48 billion 23.43 billion 17.95 billion Tunisia
2020s 14.16 billion 22.50 billion 8.34 billion Tunisia
2030s 20.98 billion 25.90 billion 4.93 billion Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Kyrgyzstan or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 25.90 billion against 20.98 billion in Kyrgyzstan as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia?
4.93 billion, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th and Tunisia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/kyrgyz-republic/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/kyrgyz-republic/tunisia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.