Somalia vs Turkmenistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Somalia
14.55 billion
in 2030
Turkmenistan
15.80 billion
in 2030
Somalia rank
26th
Turkmenistan rank
24th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Somalia
  • Turkmenistan
5.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B200920192030

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 15.80 billion against 14.55 billion in Somalia, a difference of 1.25 billion.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Somalia ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 24th of 31 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Somalia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2010s 4.55 billion 14.34 billion 9.79 billion Turkmenistan
2020s 9.77 billion 10.02 billion 250.94 million Turkmenistan
2030s 14.55 billion 15.80 billion 1.25 billion Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Somalia or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 15.80 billion against 14.55 billion in Somalia as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Somalia and Turkmenistan?
1.25 billion, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Turkmenistan?
18 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2030.
How do Somalia and Turkmenistan rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Somalia ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 24th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Somalia vs Turkmenistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/somalia-fed-rep/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/somalia-fed-rep/turkmenistan/">Somalia vs Turkmenistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.