Sudan vs Turkmenistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)

Sudan
15.71 billion
in 2030
Turkmenistan
15.80 billion
in 2030
Sudan rank
25th
Turkmenistan rank
24th

Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and) over time

  • Sudan
  • Turkmenistan
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B200020152030

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 15.80 billion against 15.71 billion in Sudan, a difference of 90.80 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Sudan ranks 25th and Turkmenistan ranks 24th of 31 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 10.63 billion 12.25 billion 1.62 billion Turkmenistan
2010s 10.05 billion 14.53 billion 4.48 billion Turkmenistan
2020s 10.13 billion 10.02 billion 116.64 million Sudan
2030s 15.71 billion 15.80 billion 90.80 million Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and), Sudan or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 15.80 billion against 15.71 billion in Sudan as of 2030.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and) between Sudan and Turkmenistan?
90.80 million, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Turkmenistan?
22 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2030.
How do Sudan and Turkmenistan rank globally for imports of goods and services, us dollar (balance of payments and)?
Sudan ranks 25th and Turkmenistan ranks 24th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Turkmenistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/sudan/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international-investment/sudan/turkmenistan/">Sudan vs Turkmenistan: Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 1,284 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.