Afghanistan vs Malawi: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Afghanistan
105.47 million
in 2019
Malawi
91.14 million
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
143rd
Malawi rank
146th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Afghanistan
- Malawi
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 105.47 million against 91.14 million in Malawi, a difference of 14.33 million.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 143rd and Malawi ranks 146th of 194 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.60 million | 35.37 million | 28.78 million | Malawi |
| 2010s | 23.28 million | 64.34 million | 41.07 million | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Afghanistan or Malawi?
- Afghanistan, at 105.47 million against 91.14 million in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 14.33 million, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Malawi rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Afghanistan ranks 143rd and Malawi ranks 146th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.