Angola vs Tunisia: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Angola
1.03 billion
in 2024
Tunisia
1.02 billion
in 2023
Angola rank
78th
Tunisia rank
80th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Angola
- Tunisia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 1.03 billion against 1.02 billion in Tunisia, a difference of 18.47 million.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tunisia ahead.
Angola ranks 78th and Tunisia ranks 80th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 553.59 million | 695.90 million | 142.31 million | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1.08 billion | 971.23 million | 109.84 million | Angola |
| 2020s | 756.44 million | 883.10 million | 126.66 million | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Angola or Tunisia?
- Angola, at 1.03 billion against 1.02 billion in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Angola and Tunisia?
- 18.47 million, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Tunisia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Tunisia rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Angola ranks 78th and Tunisia ranks 80th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.