Armenia vs Cuba: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Armenia
294.98 million
in 2024
Cuba
301.85 million
in 2022
Armenia rank
123rd
Cuba rank
122nd
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Armenia
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 301.85 million against 294.98 million in Armenia, a difference of 6.87 million.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 122nd of 194 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.44 million | 172.21 million | 162.77 million | Cuba |
| 2000s | 24.14 million | 220.15 million | 196.01 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | 136.06 million | 473.47 million | 337.41 million | Cuba |
| 2020s | 198.01 million | 296.11 million | 98.10 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Armenia or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 301.85 million against 294.98 million in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Armenia and Cuba?
- 6.87 million, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cuba?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Cuba rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Armenia ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 122nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.