Barbados vs Montenegro: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Montenegro
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 133.41 million against 123.09 million in Montenegro, a difference of 10.32 million.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Barbados ranks 137th and Montenegro ranks 139th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.04 million | 76.32 million | 41.28 million | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 42.40 million | 73.44 million | 31.04 million | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 100.72 million | 96.13 million | 4.59 million | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Barbados or Montenegro?
- Barbados, at 133.41 million against 123.09 million in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Barbados and Montenegro?
- 10.32 million, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Montenegro rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 137th and Montenegro ranks 139th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.