Belize vs Eswatini: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Belize
46.52 million
in 2024
Eswatini
38.57 million
in 2023
Belize rank
158th
Eswatini rank
160th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Belize
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belize currently reports 46.52 million against 38.57 million in Eswatini, a difference of 7.95 million.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belize ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 160th of 194 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.75 million | 18.49 million | 8.74 million | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 17.57 million | 27.32 million | 9.75 million | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 26.72 million | 36.42 million | 9.70 million | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Belize or Eswatini?
- Belize, at 46.52 million against 38.57 million in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Belize and Eswatini?
- 7.95 million, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Eswatini rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Belize ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 160th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.